¸ñ·Ï

Home

åǥÁö

ÀÏÀÚ¸® ¼Ò¿Ü °èÃþÀ» À§ÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀÏÀÚ¸® Çõ¸í

½Ç¾÷·üÀÌ Áٸ鼭 ¹Ì±¹ ³» ³ëµ¿Àα¸ÀÇ ³ëµ¿½ÃÀå Âü¿©À²Àº Á¡Â÷ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª »çȸ ¾ÈÀü¸Á µîÀÇ Á¦µµ·Î ÀÎÇØ ³ëµ¿½ÃÀå¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀηµéÀÌ À¯ÈÞ ÀηÂÀÌ µÇ¾î ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©À²ÀÇ Åë..






Helping Everyone Join America¡¯s Jobs Revolution
 

As documented in prior Trends issues, the research is unambiguous: a regular job does a lot more for individuals and society than enable a useful economic transaction.  It gives the worker something ¡°worthwhile¡± to do on a regular basis.  In the process, it minimizes the time available for engaging in crime and addictions.  In American culture, ¡°who you are is determined what you do¡±; whether you¡¯re a carpenter, plumber, technician, manager or attorney; that¡¯s why having a job gives you a sense of belonging and identity.  It also builds skills, confidence, and social bonds.  Beyond that, it provides the worker the ¡°sense of pride¡± that comes from economic self-sufficiency and the knowledge that he or she is earning something, rather than being given things.  Furthermore, in the case of younger males, it dramatically increases their ability to have a successful marriage and be part of a traditional nuclear family.  In short, a case can be made that a ¡°fully employed¡± populous is an indispensable factor contributing to Gross National Happiness and social stability, as well as to economic growth.


Therefore, ¡°full employment¡± has been an American national priority for at least the past one hundred years.  And, every presidential campaign inevitably promises to deliver more and better ¡°jobs.¡±


However, except for the World War II years, the United States has had a de facto labor surplus since at least the early 20th century.  So, the demographic trends and government policies discussed in January 2020 Trends issue, which are bringing this surplus to an end, are shocking unprepared employers, workers, and government agencies.  And, for the first time in at least 75 years, we¡¯re concerned about mobilizing and developing all our idle talent, rather than warehousing the surplus.


Three interdependent factors, combined with the natural pattern of birth, death, and economic growth to balance labor market supply and demand:


- Immigration, which increases the supply of labor beyond natural population growth;


- Off-shoring and imports enabled by globalization, which lowers the demand for U.S. labor; and


- Automation, which lowers the demand for workers, all other things being equal.


Each of these major factors, and several lesser ones, can be considered a curse or a blessing depending on how it¡¯s managed, the timeframes considered and the intrusion of nonmarket factors.


However, over the past 120 years, the bottom-line result was that a significant share of the American people was not able to have productive jobs in our economy.  That led to the creation of a ¡°permanent dependent class,¡± which relies upon the government for their survival.  To address this problem a set of institutions we now call the ¡°social safety net¡± was developed in three major waves known as the Progressive Era, the New Deal, and the Great Society.
 
This has created a modern American population consisting of six categories:


- Students, most of whom are 24 years of age or younger;


- Unpaid caregivers, such as parents not employed outside the home;


- Those who are participating in the labor force, which includes those employed full or part-time as well as those looking for work in the public or private sectors;


- Those classified as disabled;


- The retired, most of whom are over 55; and


- Others, including those in prison.


The disabled, unemployed, retired, and imprisoned are all supported, at least in part, by the social safety net.


The stagnation in employment from 2000 to 2016 is exactly what we expect to see during the Transition phase between the Installation and Deployment phases of every Techno-Economic revolution.


During the Transition phase of the Mass Production Revolution, in the 1930s & 1940s, labor force participation remained high because the social safety net was weak; the excess was reflected in skyrocketing ¡°unemployment.¡±  To compensate, the Government created jobs through programs like the Works Progress Administration, and later, the public-private ¡°war economy.¡±


Similarly, the transitional phase of the Information Revolution brought its own employment crisis in the years 2000 to 2016.  However, rather than job programs, the government used the dramatically expanded safety net programs including Social Security Disability.  The difference is that ¡°make-work¡± jobs programs are easily scaled-back permitting the subsidized and enhanced human capital to be redeployed.


So today, as the Golden Age of the Fifth Techno-Economic Revolution accelerates, many healthy, working-age American adults are not working but receiving significant government-funded help.  In fact, their income largely comes through programs like SNAP, Medicaid, and housing assistance, as well as the Social Security Disability program.  And notably, evidence shows that the programs providing that assistance have done little to help these individuals move out of poverty as the job shortage abated.  That¡¯s not surprising, since their funding usually creates incentives to add more people to their rolls.  Consequently, these anti-poverty programs wind up inadvertently inhibiting work and upward mobility, as well as exacerbating hopelessness, entitlement, loneliness, and susceptibility to addiction.


For example, in 2018, at least 9.5 million working-age adults were receiving benefits in the Medicaid and SNAP food stamps program, while reporting zero earnings.  While that¡¯s a minority of the total number of recipients on these programs which also include seniors and children, it¡¯s a large number, nonetheless.
 

The impact of this idle-adult population shows up in the labor force participation stats.  Even though our country is 10 years into an economic recovery, with U3 unemployment at 3.5 percent, we are still well below the pre-recession proportion of working-age Americans in the workforce.


Behind this low labor force, the participation rate stands the extraordinary rise in those on Social Security Disability.  In July 2015 Dr. Vincent J. Malanga and Dr. Lance Brofman published a report titled Disabilitys Destabilizing Impact on the Labor Market.  They noted that labor force participation had historically behaved cyclically within a gently declining trend.  Participation consistently tended to fall during recessions and rise during economic recoveries as job prospects improved.   But, in the most recent business cycle, from 2000 through 2015, the labor force participation rate fell as expected during the recession phase, but it kept falling during the recovery as well.  Since then, there has been an improvement in labor force participation as well as the bellwether participation rate for males in the prime working-age category of 25 to 54. Nonetheless, the participation rate for prime-aged men is still far below the rates of the 1990s.


Notably, the outsized rise in disability payments in the Great Recession essentially bankrupted the system and forced a congressional bailout in 2015.  In a March 2018 report titled Disability and Participation, Malanga & Brofman explained that as part of the 2015 bailout legislation, various reforms were enacted, such as requiring medical evidence for disability claims.  Another reform excluded individuals and entities convicted of felonies related to the Social Security Act or who had been previously penalized for the submission of false evidence from acting as sources of medical evidence.


As the latest data indicates, these reforms were responsible for the decline in disability rolls that began to occur in 2016.  Indeed, even though the total population has increased, the numbers applying for and receiving disability payments has declined since 2015.

 

Most Social Security disability claims are processed through a network of local Social Security Administration field offices and state agencies.  Today, we can see that applications at both the field offices and state agencies have finally declined to below pre-recession levels.  The same is true of the numbers receiving benefit awards.  And, while there is considerable volatility in the monthly data, a twelve-month moving average of the data clearly shows a downward trend.

 

The actual number of Americans receiving disability payments is about 8.4 million and began declining from about 9 million in 2016.  Coincidentally, labor force participation has been improving in jagged fashion since 2016.  And the news is likely to get better. While some of the reforms introduced by the 2015 bailout legislation were immediately enacted, some are being phased in; and others will not take effect until 2022.


Building on the changes already in the pipeline, the Trump administration proposed a series of new regulations relating to the administration of the Social Security Disability program in November 2019.  These rules would have the effect of reducing the number of people collecting disability payments by conducting more frequent reviews of whether a person¡¯s medical condition improved sufficiently to allow substantial gainful activity. The rule would create a new category of recipient, called ¡°Medical Improvement Likely,¡± where reviews would occur biannually.


This new rule can be viewed as another in a series of reforms that have been introduced in an effort to curb abuses in the disability program over the past decade.  As might be expected there were protests by beneficiary groups and members of Congress regarding proposed changes.  A letter and press release in December asserted that the proposed rule would have a very significant and potentially harmful impact on Social Security and SSI disability beneficiaries.  The letter also urged that the comment period for the proposed new regulations be extended by 45 days beyond the mid-January 2020 cutoff date.  However, the request was denied by the Office of Disability Policy.


In support of the proposed rule change, the Office of Disability Policy cited advances in medical technology and the results obtained by research from the National Bureau of Economic Research regarding a group of beneficiaries and recipients whose benefits terminated due to a 1997 statutory change.  The research effort examined the effect of a loss of benefit eligibility on work activity during the year of benefit termination and the subsequent eleven years, 1997 to 2008.  Overall, about 22 percent returned to work at a substantial gainful activity level during the first three years following benefit termination.


Presumably, reforms under the new proposed rule will begin to be implemented in 2020.


Abuse of the disability system is not the only cause of the downward trend in labor participation that has been in effect since the 1990s.  No doubt the opioid crisis and other varieties of increased substance abuse have had an adverse effect on society generally as well as workforce participation.  Other factors are undoubtedly at work as well, but at least there are specific efforts being made to curb flagrant abuse of the disability system.


Given this trend, we offer the following forecasts

 

First, the existing and proposed changes to the disability system will have a major impact on the workforce.


Indeed, with the overall unemployment rate hovering around a post -World-War-II low of 3.5%, labor markets are tight yet inflationary wage increases remain notably absent.  Currently, the participation rate for prime aged males is 89.2 percent versus the absolute 2014 low of 87.9 percent.  Maintaining this upward trajectory would go a long way toward reinforcing the economy¡¯s growth record.  Given normal labor force growth of about 1% per year, if the participation rate for prime-aged males were merely to get back to the roughly 91% level that prevailed before the Great Recession, new workers would be generated at a rate of about 1.2 million yearly.  This would provide further support for consumer spending, overall economic growth, and social stability.


Second, putting the genuinely disabled onto a path to participate more fully in the economy will be worth the effort.


The big payback from disability reform comes from putting to work those who are not legitimately disabled.  However, there is is a lot to be said for finding ways to gainfully employ disabled people who deserve more from life than playing video games and watching TV.  A combination of employer incentives and adaptive technology could enable people with physical and cognitive impairments to create value.  This is not only good for the employee, but for the employer and the broader community.  And,


Third, reforming college loan programs will also help produce more and better-prepared workers in the medium term.


Over the past two decades, much of the surplus worker population has been shunted into ¡°academic holding¡± cells because the economy was not able to absorb them.  Changes in the college loan criteria made it possible for almost anyone to borrow money for almost any field of study, regardless of their prospects for repaying the loan.  In all too many cases, this not only took the person out of the labor pool for four to six years, but it also eliminated the opportunity that the person would have had to get ¡°on the job training¡± during those years.  Because of the poor outcomes, the status quo is untenable.  The likely solution is that fewer students will attend full-time liberal arts Bachelors¡¯s programs and more will pursue part-time vocational programs.  Coupled with skills-based immigration priorities, and reform of the disability system, this will go a long way toward eliminating America¡¯s growing skills shortage.


References


1. Trends.  July 15, 2019.  Trends Editors.  Eliminating Poverty and Maximizing Happiness. 

https://audiotech.com/trends-magazine/eliminating-poverty-and-maximizing-happiness/


2. AEIdeas.  July 2017. Kevin C. Corinth.  Barriers to Work and Social Enterprise. 

https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Barriers-to-work-and-social-enterprise.pdf


3. AEIdeas.  January 2018.  Angela Rachidi.  The Working Class and the Federal Government¡¯s Social Safety Net. 

https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Barriers-to-work-and-social-enterprise.pdf


4. Seeking Alpha.  Jan. 26, 2020.  Lance Brofman.  Disability Reform And The Labor Force. 

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4319122-disability-reform-and-labor-force


5. Seeking Alpha.  March 18, 2018.  Lance Brofman.  Disability And Participation. 

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4157404-disability-and-participation






½Ç¾÷·üÀÌ Áٸ鼭 ¹Ì±¹ ³» ³ëµ¿Àα¸ÀÇ ³ëµ¿½ÃÀå Âü¿©À²Àº Á¡Â÷ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª »çȸ ¾ÈÀü¸Á µîÀÇ Á¦µµ·Î ÀÎÇØ ³ëµ¿½ÃÀå¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀηµéÀÌ À¯ÈÞ ÀηÂÀÌ µÇ¾î ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©À²ÀÇ Åë°è¿¡ ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Ù. »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ Á÷¾÷°ú »ó°ü¾ø´Â ±³¾ç ÇÐ»ç °úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸é¹ÐÇÑ °ËÅä°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. Àå¾Ö°¡ ÀÖÁö¸¸ ³ëµ¿ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀηÂ, ±³¾ç ÇÐ»ç °úÁ¤º¸´Ù´Â ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ Á÷¾÷ ±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇØ À̾߱âÇØ º¸ÀÚ.


ÀÏÀÚ¸®¿¡ °üÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿¬±¸µéÀº °øÅëµÈ ÀÇ°ßÀ» µµÃâÇÑ´Ù.


Á¤±ÔÁ÷ ÀÏÀÚ¸®°¡ °æÁ¦Àû °Å·¡º¸´Ù °³Àΰú »çȸ¿¡ ´õ ¸¹Àº °øÇåÀ» ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀº »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô ¡®Á¤±âÀûÀ¸·Î¡¯ ¡®°¡Ä¡Àִ¡¯ ÀÏÀ» Á¦°øÇϱ⠶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¹üÁ˳ª °¢Á¾ ³²¿ë¿¡ ºüÁ®µé ½Ã°£ÀÌ ¾ø¾îÁö°Å³ª ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­µÉ ¼öµµ ÀÖ´Ù. ¼¼°è ¾î´À »çȸ¿¡¼­µç ¡°ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ ÇÏ´Â ÀÏÀÌ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù¡±´Â ¹®È­¿Í ÀνÄÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ¸ñ¼öµç ¹è°ü°øÀ̵ç, ±â¼úÀÚÀÌµç °ü¸®ÀÚÀ̵ç, ÆÇ»çµç º¯È£»çµç ±× Á÷¾÷À» °¡Áö°í ±× ÀÏÀ» Çϸ鼭 ¼Ò¼Ó°¨°ú Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ´õºÒ¾î ±â¼ú°ú ÀڽۨÀÌ ½×À̸鼭 »çȸÀû À¯´ë°¨µµ ´õ °­È­µÈ´Ù.


ÀÏÀÚ¸®´Â À̹ۿ¡µµ °æÁ¦Àû ÀÚ¸³À» ½º½º·Î Àϱɴٴ ¡®ÀÚÁ¸°¨¡¯, ÁÖ¾îÁø ¹«¾ð°¡¸¦ ¹Þ±âº¸´Ù ½º½º·Î ¹«¾ð°¡¸¦ ¹ø´Ù´Â Àνĵµ ÀÖ´Ù. ´õ¿íÀÌ ÀþÀº ¼¼´ëÀÇ °æ¿ì ¼º°øÀûÀ¸·Î °áÈ¥ »ýÈ°À» ÇÏ°í ÇϳªÀÇ °¡Á¤À» Àϱ¸´Â ´É·ÂÀ» ´õ Å°¿ï ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î, ¡®¿ÏÀü °í¿ë¡¯ Àα¸´Â °æÁ¦ ¼ºÀå»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Àüü ±¸¼º¿øµéÀÇ Çູ°ú »çȸ ¾ÈÁ¤¿¡ ÇʼöºÒ°¡°áÇÑ ¿ä¼ÒÀÌ´Ù.


ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °¡Ä¡¸¦ Áö´Ñ ¡®¿ÏÀü °í¿ë¡¯Àº Áö³­ 100³â µ¿¾ÈÀÇ ¹Ì±¹À̶ó´Â ±¹°¡ÀÇ ÃÖ¿ì¼± °úÁ¦¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÌÀ¯·Î °ÅÀÇ ¸ðµç ´ëÅë·É Èĺ¸ÀÚµéÀº ÇÊ¿¬ÀûÀ¸·Î ¡®´õ ¸¹Àº ÀÏÀÚ¸®¡¯¸¦ °ø¾à ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ ¹èÁ¤Çß´Ù.


±×·¯³ª 2Â÷ ¼¼°è ´ëÀüÀÇ ½Ã±â¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í ¹Ì±¹¿¡´Â Àû¾îµµ 20¼¼±â ÃʺÎÅÍ »ç½Ç»ó ³ëµ¿·Â¿¡ ÀÖ¾î À׿©°¡ Á¸ÀçÇØ¿Ô´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÀÌÁ¦ 75³â ¸¸¿¡ óÀ½À¸·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À׿©¸¦ ¹æÄ¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¸ðµç °¡´ÉÇÑ ¿ª·®À» µ¿¿øÇÏ°í °³¹ßÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÃÊÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù.


³ëµ¿ ½ÃÀåÀÇ °ø±Þ°ú ¼ö¿ä¸¦ ±ÕÇü ¸ÂÃß·Á¸é, Ãâ»ý, »ç¸Á, °æÁ¦ ¼ºÀåÀ̶ó´Â ÀÚ¿¬½º·¯¿î ÆÐÅÏ°ú ´ÙÀ½ ¼¼ °¡Áö »óÈ£ÀÇÁ¸Àû ¿ä¼ÒµéÀ» °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.


- À̹Π: À̹ÎÀº ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ Àα¸ Áõ°¡¸¦ ³Ñ¾î ³ëµ¿·Â °ø±ÞÀ» Áõ°¡½ÃŲ´Ù


- ¼¼°èÈ­ : ¼¼°èÈ­·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¿ÀÇÁ¼î¾î¸µ°ú ¼öÀÔÀ¸·Î ¹Ì±¹ ³» ³ëµ¿ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ³·¾ÆÁø´Ù


- ÀÚµ¿È­ : ÀÚµ¿È­·Î ÀÎÇØ ³ëµ¿ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ³·¾ÆÁø´Ù


ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼¼ °¡Áö ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀΰú ±âŸ ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ÀÛÀº ¿äÀεéÀº ±×°ÍµéÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô °ü¸®µÇ°í, ŸÀÓÇÁ·¹ÀÓ(time frame)ÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô °í·ÁµÇ°í, ºñ½ÃÀåÀû ¿äÀÎÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀ̳Ŀ¡ µû¶ó ÀúÁÖ°¡ µÇ°Å³ª ÃູÀÌ µÇ±âµµ ÇÑ´Ù.


±×·¯³ª Áö³­ ¾à 1¼¼±â µ¿¾È °¡Àå ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ °á°ú´Â ¹Ì±¹ ±¹¹ÎÀÇ »ó´ç ºÎºÐÀÌ ¹Ì±¹ °æÁ¦¿¡¼­ »ý»êÀûÀÎ Á÷¾÷À» °¡Áú ¼ö ¾ø´Ù´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¡®¿µ±¸Àû ÀÇÁ¸ °è±Þ¡¯ÀÌ ¸¸µé¾îÁ³°í, À̵éÀº »ýÁ¸À» À§ÇØ Á¤ºÎ¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¡®»çȸÀû ¾ÈÀü¸Á¡¯À¸·Î ºÒ¸®´Â ±âÁ¦°¡ ŵ¿ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


°á°úÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »çȸÀû ¾ÈÀü¸ÁÀº 6°¡Áö ¹üÁÖÀÇ Çö´ë ¹Ì±¹ Àα¸¸¦ ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù.


1) Çлý, ´ëºÎºÐ 24¼¼ ÀÌÇÏ


2) ¹«Á÷ »óÅÂÀÇ ºÎ¸ð¿Í °°Àº µ¹º½ÀÌ(caregiver)


3) °ø°ø ȤÀº ¹Î°£ ºÎ¹®¿¡¼­ ÀÏÀÚ¸®¸¦ ãÀ» »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ǮŸÀÓ È¤Àº ½Ã°£Á¦±Ù¹«·Î ÀÌ¹Ì °í¿ëµÈ »ç¶÷µéÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â, ³ëµ¿ÀηÂ


4) Àå¾ÖÀÎÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ »ç¶÷µé


5) ´ëºÎºÐ 55¼¼ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ÀºÅðÀÚµé


6) ±³µµ¼Ò ¼ö°¨ÀÚ¸¦ ºñ·ÔÇÑ ±âŸ


Àå¾ÖÀÎ, ½Ç¾÷ÀÚ, ÅðÁ÷ÀÚ, ¼ö°¨ÀÚ´Â ¸ðµÎ »çȸÀû ¾ÈÀü¸Á¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Àû¾îµµ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¿øÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 2000³âºÎÅÍ 2016³â±îÁöÀÇ °í¿ë Á¤Ã¼´Â ±â¼ú°æÁ¦ Çõ¸íÀÇ ½ÃÀÛ°ú Àü°³ ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¹Ì Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¿¹ÃøµÈ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


1930³â´ë¿Í 1940³â´ë, ´ë·®»ý»ê Çõ¸íÀ¸·Î ÀüȯµÇ´Â ´Ü°è¿¡¼­´Â ´ç½Ã »çȸÀû ¾ÈÀü¸ÁÀÌ ¹Ì¾àÇ߱⠶§¹®¿¡ ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©°¡ ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ³ô°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³ëµ¿ À׿© ȤÀº ÃÊ°úºÐÀº ±ÞÁõÇÏ´Â ¡®½Ç¾÷¡¯¿¡ °ð¹Ù·Î ¹Ý¿µµÇ±âµµ Çß´Ù. Á¤ºÎ¸¦ À̸¦ º¸¿ÏÇϱâ À§ÇØ °ø°ø»ç¾÷ÃËÁø±¹(Works Progress Administration; WPA)°ú °°Àº ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ ÀÏÀÚ¸®¸¦ âÃâÇß°í ³ªÁß¿¡´Â °ø°ø-¹Î°£ ¡®ÀüÀï °æÁ¦¡¯¸¦ ½ÃÀÛÇß´Ù.


¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î, Á¤º¸ Çõ¸íÀÇ °úµµ±â ´Ü°è´Â 2000³â¿¡¼­ 2016³â±îÁö ÀÚü °í¿ë À§±â¸¦ °¡Á® ¿Ô´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¤ºÎ´Â °ú°Å¿Í °°Àº Á÷¾÷ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ´ë½Å »çȸ º¸Àå Àå¾Ö Á¦µµ¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇØ ´õ Æø³Ð°Ô È®´ëµÈ ¾ÈÀü¸Á ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» »ç¿ëÇß´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î ¿À´Ã³¯ »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú°æÁ¦ Çõ¸íÀÇ ½Ã´ë°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó, °Ç°­ÇÏ°í ³ëµ¿·ÂÀ» °®Ãá ¼ö¸¹Àº ¹Ì±¹ ¼ºÀεéÀÌ ÀÏÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í Á¤ºÎ·ÎºÎÅÍ »ó´çÇÑ Áö¿øÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


½ÇÁ¦·Î À̵éÀÇ ¼öÀÔÀº ÁÖ·Î SNAP, ¸ÞµðÄÉÀ̵å(Medicaid), ÁÖÅà Áö¿ø°ú °°Àº ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú »çȸ º¸Àå Àå¾Ö ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. ¹®Á¦´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Áö¿øÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÇÁ·Î±×·¥µéÀÌ °³ÀÎÀÌ ºó°ï¿¡¼­ ¹þ¾î³ª´Â µ¥ °ÅÀÇ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥µéÀº ºÎÁÖÀÇÇÏ°Ô ÀÏÀÚ¸®¿Í ½ÅºÐ »ó½ÂÀÇ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀ» ¹æÇØÇÏ°í, ¿ÀÈ÷·Á Àý¸Á, ÀÚ°Ý, ¿Ü·Î¿ò, °¢Á¾ ³²¿ë°ú Áßµ¶¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãë¾à¼ºÀ» ´õ ¾ÇÈ­½ÃÄ×´Ù.


¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, 2018³â¿¡¸¸ ÃÖ¼Ò 950¸¸ ¸íÀÇ ³ëµ¿¿¬·É ¼ºÀÎÀÌ ¸ÞµðÄÉÀ̵å¿Í SNAP Ǫµå ½ºÅÆÇÁ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À¸·Î ÇýÅÃÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Âµ¥, À̵éÀÌ Á÷Á¢ ¹ú¾îµéÀÎ ¼öÀÍÀº Á¦·Î¿´´Ù. À̵éÀº ÀÌ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ´Â Àüü ¼ö·ÉÀÚ Áß ¼Ò¼ö¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÏÁö¸¸ ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í »ó´çÇÑ ¸¹Àº Àα¸¶ó ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.


ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À¯ÈÞ ¼ºÀÎ Àα¸ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀº ³ëµ¿ Âü¿© Åë°è¿¡ °í½º¶õÈ÷ ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù. U3 ½Ç¾÷·üÀÌ 3.5%ÀÎ »óȲ¿¡¼­ ¹Ì±¹ÀÌ °æÁ¦¸¦ ȸº¹Çϱâ±îÁö 10³âÀÌ ¼Ò¿äµÆ´Ù. ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ³ëµ¿½ÃÀå¿¡ Á¾»çÇÏ´Â ¹Ì±¹ÀÎ Àα¸ÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº ³·´Ù. ÀÌ·¸°Ô ³·Àº ÀÌÀ¯ÀÇ ¹èÈÄ¿¡´Â »çȸ º¸Àå Àå¾Ö Á¦µµ¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷µéÀÌ ºñ¾àÀûÀ¸·Î ´Ã¾î³µ±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù.


2015³â 7¿ù ºó¼¾Æ® J. ¸»¶õ°¡(Vincent J. Malanga) ¹Ú»ç¿Í ·£½º ºê·ÎÇÁ¸¸(Lance Brofman) ¹Ú»ç´Â ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©°¡ ¿ª»çÀûÀ¸·Î õõÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â Ãß¼¼ ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡¼­ ÁÖ±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸¿© ¿Ô´Ù°í ¾ð±ÞÇß´Ù. ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©´Â °æ±â ħü±â µ¿¾È Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ°í °æÁ¦ ȸº¹±â µ¿¾È Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °¡Àå ÃÖ±Ù ºñÁî´Ï½º Áֱ⿡¼­ 2000³âºÎÅÍ 2015³â±îÁö °æ±â ħü±â¿¡´Â ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©À²ÀÌ ¿¹»ó´ë·Î ¶³¾îÁ³Áö¸¸ ȸº¹±â¿¡µµ °è¼Ó ¶³¾îÁö´Â Çö»óÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇß´Ù. ±× ÀÌÈÄ·Î 25~54¼¼ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ³ëµ¿ ¿¬·É Ä«Å×°í¸®¿¡¼­ ³²¼ºÀÇ Âü¿©À²»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©µµ °³¼±µÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í Á߳⠳²¼ºÀÇ Âü¿©À²Àº ¿©ÀüÈ÷ 1990³â´ë ºñÀ²º¸´Ù ÇÑÂü ¾Æ·¡¿´´Ù.


ƯÈ÷, ´ëºÒȲ ±â°£¿¡ Àå¾Ö ¼ö´çÀÌ ±ÞÁõÇϸ鼭 º»ÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÌ ÆÄ»êÇÏ°í, 2015³â ÀÇȸ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±¸Á¦ ±ÝÀ¶¾ÈÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸»¶õ°¡¿Í ºê·ÎÇÁ¸¸ ¹Ú»ç´Â 2018³â 3¿ù ¡¸Àå¾Ö ¹× Âü¿©(Disability and Participation)¡¹ º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ 2015³â ±¸Á¦ ±ÝÀ¶¹ýÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î Àå¾Ö û±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇÇÐÀû Áõ°Å¸¦ ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ °³ÇõÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù°í ¹àÇû´Ù. ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ °³ÇõÀº »çȸ º¸Àå¹ý°ú °ü·ÃµÈ Áß¹üÁË·Î À¯ÁË ÆÇ°áÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò°Å³ª ÀÇÇÐÀû ÀÚ·á·Î ÇãÀ§ Áõ°Å¸¦ Á¦ÃâÇÑ °Í¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÌÀü¿¡ ó¹úÀ» ¹ÞÀº °³Àΰú ´Üü¸¦ Á¦¿Ü½ÃÅ°´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù.


ÃֽŠµ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °³ÇõÀº 2016³â¿¡ ½ÃÀÛµÈ Àå¾Ö ¸íºÎ¸¦ Ãà¼Ò½ÃÅ°´Â ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦·Î Àüü Àα¸°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ 2015³âºÎÅÍ Àå¾Ö ¼ö´ç ½Åû ¹× ¼ö·ÉÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇß´Ù.
 
´ëºÎºÐÀÇ »çȸ º¸Àå Àå¾Ö û±¸´Â Áö¿ª »çȸ º¸Àå±¹ »ç¹«¼Ò ¹× ÁÖ Á¤ºÎ ±â°üÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¸¦ ÅëÇØ Ã³¸®µÈ´Ù. ¿À´Ã³¯ ¿ì¸®´Â ÇöÀå »ç¹«¼Ò¿Í ÁÖ Á¤ºÎ ±â°üÀÇ ÀÀ¿ë ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ °á±¹ ÀÌÀü ħü ¼öÁØ ÀÌÇϷΠû±¸ ¼öÄ¡°¡ ¶³¾îÁ³´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¼ö´ç ÇýÅÃÀ» ¹Þ´Â ¼ýÀÚµµ ¸¶Âù°¡ÁöÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¿ù°£ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿¡´Â »ó´çÇÑ º¯µ¿¼ºÀÌ ÀÖÁö¸¸ 12°³¿ù °£ÀÇ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À̵¿ Æò±ÕÀº Ç϶ô Ãß¼¼¸¦ ºÐ¸íÈ÷ º¸¿©ÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù.


Àå¾Ö ¼ö´çÀ» ¹Þ´Â ¹Ì±¹ÀÎÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ ¼ö´Â ¾à 810¸¸ ¸íÀ̸ç 2016³âÀÇ ¾à 900¸¸ ¸í¿¡¼­ °¨¼ÒÇϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇß´Ù. ¿ì¿¬È÷µµ 2016³âºÎÅÍ ³ëµ¿·Â Âü¿©°¡ ´Ù¼Ò °³¼±µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 2015³â ±¸Á¦ ±ÝÀ¶¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ µµÀÔµÈ °³Çõ Áß ÀϺδ Áï½Ã Á¦Á¤µÇ¾úÁö¸¸ ÀϺδ ´Ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.


ÀÌ¹Ì ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î, Æ®·³ÇÁ ÇàÁ¤ºÎ´Â 2019³â 11¿ù »çȸ º¸Àå Àå¾Ö ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ¿î¿µ°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¤À» Á¦¾ÈÇß´Ù. ÀÌ »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¤Àº Àå¾ÖÀÎ ¼öÃëÀÎ ¼ö¸¦ ÁÙÀÌ´Â È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ±ÔÁ¤Àº °³ÀÎÀÇ °Ç°­ »óÅ°¡ ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÍÇÑ °æÁ¦ È°µ¿À» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÃæºÐÈ÷ °³¼±µÇ¾ú´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºó¹øÇÏ°Ô °ËÅäÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


ÀÌ »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¤Àº Áö³­ 10³â µ¿¾È Àå¾Ö ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ ³²¿ëÀ» ¾ïÁ¦Çϱâ À§ÇØ µµÀÔµÈ ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ °³ÇõµéÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¹»óµÇ´Â ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ, ¼öÇýÀÚ ±×·ì°ú ÀÇ¿øµéÀº »õ·Ó°Ô Á¦¾ÈµÈ º¯°æ »çÇ׿¡ ´ëÇØ Ç×ÀÇÇß°í, 12¿ù¿¡ ¹ßÇ¥µÈ º¸µµ ÀڷḦ ÅëÇØ ÀÌ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ »çȸ º¸Àå ¹× SSI Àå¾Ö ¼öÇýÀÚ¿¡°Ô ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ°í ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î ÇØ·Î¿î ¿µÇâÀ» ³¢Ä¥ °ÍÀ̶ó°í ÁÖÀåÇß´Ù.


±ÔÁ¤ º¯°æÀ» Áö¿øÇϱâ À§ÇØ, °ü·Ã ´ç±¹Àº ÀÇ·á ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü°ú 1997³â ¹ý±Ô º¯°æÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÇýÅÃÀÌ Á¾·áµÈ ¼öÇýÀÚ ¹× ¼öÇýÀÚ ±×·ì¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¹°¡°æÁ¦¿¬±¸±¹ÀÇ ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¸¦ ÀοëÇß´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ¼ö´ç(±Þ¿©) Á¾·á ¿¬µµ¿Í 1997³â-2008³â±îÁö 11³â µ¿¾ÈÀÇ ±Þ¿© ÀÚ°Ý »ó½ÇÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ÇýÅà Á¾·á ÈÄ ¾à 22%°¡ óÀ½ 3³â µ¿¾È ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÍÇÑ °æÁ¦ È°µ¿ ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î º¹±ÍÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.


¹°·Ð Àå¾Ö Á¦µµÀÇ ³²¿ëÀÌ 1990³â´ëºÎÅÍ ½ÃÇàµÈ ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©ÀÇ Ç϶ô Ãß¼¼¿¡ ÀÖ¾î À¯ÀÏÇÑ ¿øÀÎÀº ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ¿äÀε鵵 ÀǽÉÀÇ ¿©Áö¾øÀÌ ¿µÇâÀ» ³¢ÃÆÁö¸¸, Àå¾Ö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¾Ç¿ëÀ» ¸·±â À§ÇÑ ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑÀÇ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.


ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ±ÔÁ¤ÀÇ µîÀå°ú Ãß¼¼¸¦ °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§, ¿ì¸®´Â ÇâÈÄ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº ¿¹ÃøÀ» ³»·Á º»´Ù.


ù°, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ±×¸®°í °èȹµÈ ¡®Àå¾Ö ½Ã½ºÅÛ º¯°æ¡¯ÀÌ ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ³ëµ¿ ½ÃÀå¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


½ÇÁ¦·Î, Àüü ½Ç¾÷·üÀÌ 2Â÷ ¼¼°è ´ëÀü ÀÌÈÄ 3.5%·Î ³·¾ÆÁö¸é¼­ ³ëµ¿ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¹Ðµµ´Â ³ô¾ÆÁ³Áö¸¸, ÀÎÇ÷¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÀÓ±Ý ÀλóÀº ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ??¹Ì¹ÌÇÑ »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù. ÇöÀç ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ 35-45¼¼ ³²¼ºÀÇ ³ëµ¿ Âü¿©À²Àº 89.2%ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ »ó½Â ±Ëµµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ·Á¸é °æÁ¦ ¼ºÀåÀÌ °è¼Ó ÀÌ·ïÁ®¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¬°£ ¾à 1%ÀÇ Á¤»óÀûÀÎ ³ëµ¿·Â ¼ºÀåÀ» °¨¾ÈÇÒ ¶§, 35-45¼¼ ³²¼ºÀÇ Âü¿©À²ÀÌ ´ëºÒȲ ÀÌÀü ¾à 91% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ȸ±ÍÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì »õ·Î¿î ³ëµ¿ÀÚ°¡ ¸Å³â 120¸¸ ¸íÀÇ ºñÀ²·Î ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù.


µÑ°, Àå¾Ö Àα¸¸¦ °æÁ¦¿¡ º¸´Ù ¿ÂÀüÈ÷ Âü¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ÃæºÐÈ÷ °¡Ä¡ ÀÖ´Â ÀÏÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


ÀÌ °³ÇõÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Å« ¼öÇý´Â ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î´Â Àå¾Ö°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ »ç¶÷µéÀ» °í¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ºñ·ÔµÈ´Ù. À̵éÀÌ ºñµð¿À °ÔÀÓÀ̳ª TV¸¦ º¸´Â °Íº¸´Ù Àλý¿¡¼­ ´õ ¸¹Àº ¼ºÃ븦 ÀÌ·ê ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï À̵éÀ» °í¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¸¹Àº »ç·ÊµéÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. °í¿ëÁÖ Àμ¾Æ¼ºê¿Í ÀûÀÀÇü ±â¼úÀÇ Á¶ÇÕÀ¸·Î ½ÅüÀû, ÀÎÁöÀû Àå¾Ö°¡ ÀÖ´Â »ç¶÷µéÀÌ »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î Å« °¡Ä¡¸¦ âÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ°ÍÀº °í¿ëµÈ Á÷¿ø»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °í¿ëÁÖ¿¡°Ôµµ, Àü »çȸÀûÀ¸·Îµµ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀÏÀÌ´Ù.


¼Â°, ÇÐÀÚ±Ý ´ëÃâ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ °³Çõ ¶ÇÇÑ ÁßÀå±âÀûÀ¸·Î ´õ ÈǸ¢ÇÏ°Ô ÁغñµÈ ³ëµ¿ÀÚ¸¦ ¹èÃâÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÙ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.


Áö³­ 20³â µ¿¾È, À׿© ³ëµ¿ Àα¸ÀÇ ´ëºÎºÐÀº °æÁ¦°¡ À̵éÀ» Èí¼öÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »óȲÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¾ú±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇÐÀÚ±Ý ´ëÃâ ¿ÏÈ­ Á¤Ã¥À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ³ëµ¿ ½ÃÀå¿¡ ÅõÀ﵃ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼ö¸¹Àº ÀηÂÀ» ´ëÇÐÀÌ Èí¼öÇÏ¿©, 4-6³â µ¿¾È À̵éÀÌ °æÁ¦¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¡®½ÇÁ¦ Á÷¾÷ ÈƷá¯À» ¹ÞÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇعö·È´Ù. µðÁöÅÐ °æÁ¦·Î º¯È­ÇÏ´Â ¿À´Ã³¯, ǮŸÀÓ ±³¾ç Çлç ÇÁ·Î±×·¥º¸´Ù´Â ½Ã°£Á¦ Á÷¾÷ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ã´Â ÇлýµéÀÌ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇØÁú °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±â¼ú Áß½ÉÀÇ ¿ì¼ö À̹ÎÀÚ ¿ì¼±±Ç°ú Àå¾Ö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ °³ÇõÀ» ÅëÇØ, ÇöÀç ¹Ì±¹ÀÌ °Þ°í ÀÖ´Â ±â¼ú Àη ºÎÁ· ¹®Á¦ÀÇ »ó´çÇÑ ºÎºÐÀÌ ÇØ°áµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.


* *

References List :
1. Trends.  July 15, 2019.  Trends Editors.  Eliminating Poverty and Maximizing Happiness.
https://audiotech.com/trends-magazine/eliminating-poverty-and-maximizing-happiness/


2. AEIdeas.  July 2017. Kevin C. Corinth.  Barriers to Work and Social Enterprise.
https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Barriers-to-work-and-social-enterprise.pdf


3. AEIdeas.  January 2018.  Angela Rachidi.  The Working Class and the Federal Government¡¯s Social Safety Net.
https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Barriers-to-work-and-social-enterprise.pdf


4. Seeking Alpha.  Jan. 26, 2020.  Lance Brofman.  Disability Reform And The Labor Force.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4319122-disability-reform-and-labor-force


5. Seeking Alpha.  March 18, 2018.  Lance Brofman.  Disability And Participation.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4157404-disability-and-participation


ÀÌÀü

¸ñ·Ï